‘Two-sided risk’ Medicare Advantage plans improve patient outcomes

America’s health system is buckling under the weight of several converging pressures: an aging population, high rates of chronic disease, a shortage of clinicians, and rising costs. The response to these challenges will determine the future of care in this country — and new evidence suggests the solution is rooted in how we deliver and pay for care.

A peer-reviewed study published in the American Journal of Managed Care by America’s Physician Groups (APG), CareJourney, and Optum looked at whether health outcomes for dual-eligible Medicare and Medicaid patients (people who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid) vary depending on the payment model they’re treated under.  

We examined health outcomes data under three different Medicare payment models: at-risk, or “two-sided risk” Medicare Advantage plans (where physician groups take full financial risk for patient care); fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare Advantage (where providers are paid per service by the Medicare Advantage plan insurer); and traditional Medicare (where providers are paid per service by the government).

STAT+ Exclusive Story

This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

Unlock this article — plus in-depth analysis, newsletters, premium events, and news alerts.

Already have an account? Log in

View All Plans

To read the rest of this story subscribe to STAT+.

Subscribe

Berita Terkini

Berita Terbaru

Daftar Terbaru

News

Berita Terbaru

Flash News

RuangJP

Pemilu

Berita Terkini

Prediksi Bola

Togel Deposit Pulsa

Technology

Otomotif

Berita Terbaru

Daftar Judi Slot Online Terpercaya

Slot yang lagi gacor

Teknologi

Berita terkini

Berita Pemilu

Berita Teknologi

Hiburan

master Slote

Berita Terkini

Pendidikan

Resep

Jasa Backlink

One Piece Terbaru